Let me start this off by reiterating my absolute adoration for Magic 2010.  While my feelings pre-release were strong, my post-release opinion of the set is even more positive.  I am particularly struck by the sheer value cram-packed into this set.  I could name 25+ rares in the set that are/will be worth more than five bucks (which is saying a lot when you're buying a $3 pack of cards).  The uncommons and commons are exciting enough and the mythics are simply to die for.  (Editor's Note: I hope you liked the shameless plug Wiz, you can slip me that c-note we agreed on later... though you might want read the rest of the article first).  That having been said, there is one major sticking point for me in this newest core set.  One that I've eluded to in previous articles but have been meaning to flesh out for some time now.

[caption id="attachment_3740" align="alignright" width="280" caption="Excellent games require thoughtful balance."][/caption]

Player vs Player games are always made or broken upon the alter of balance.  Whether it be Terran vs Zerg vs Protoss in Starcraft or Ryu vs Blanka in Street Fighter II, the entire PvP experience hinges on that game's ability to give each of its contestants an equal, yet totally unique chance at winning.  Bear with me here - I've never been a fan of racing.  In a race, contestants are locked into a single path with very few or no options when it comes to forging a path to victory.  Participants just run or drive or gallop in one direction as fast as they can.  There is no strategy involved, no one is going to do anything "tricky" or particularly surprising.  It is simply a live test of "how fast can these people get from point A to point B?"

Magic, though it may feel like it sometimes, is not a race.  The diversity of "avenues to victory" is often overwhelming.  At any time, either player could bust out magic that you haven't seen in 10 years.  Part of what I love about the game is its ability to stay fresh and unpredictable while at the same time staying true to it's cornerstones.  It is a fluid game.  Top decks may seem unstoppable for a time only to get completely crushed at the next Grand Prix event.  Since it is always in motion Magic is able to "correct itself" every three months if any one deck gets completely out of control.  For the most part, I think WotC has done a good job of mixing it up.  Whether you're a fan of the multicolored Alara block or not, it would be tough to argue that standard, as it stands, isn't exceptionally diverse with several stellar deck choices out there.  Wizards has a tough job when it comes to balancing a game with over 10,ooo pieces.  They take the time to balance it for sealed, standard, multiplayer, draft and two-headed giant.  But my quarrel today is with their neglect of quite possibly the most important balance of them all  - Color Balance.  In particular what this recent imbalance has done to my personal favorite hue of magic -  Blue.

Color balance is an important part of the game as many casual players (the same players Wizards is now marketing towards) appreciate the simplicity and flavor of a good burn deck or zombie deck or yes, even a good old fashioned blue control deck.  The ability to create viable versions of these classics in standard, or even extended formats is very important to your average casual player. In Magic 2010 Red burn seems to be back on track, Green is rolling knee deep in awesome creatures, Black looks to be cool again and White... well.. white is Magic the Gathering right now.  But blue?...  It is a shame any time one or more colors becomes "unplayable" as a mono colored cornerstone.  It removes that element of flavor and diversity from the game.  I would be just as critical (okay maybe not just as critical) if green were unplayable as a mono-colored variant.  But that has never and and will never happen.  I am happy for red wizards everywhere post-M10.  Red burn is back with a vengeance and that old flavor tastes just as sweet as it did years ago -it will never get old.  Its just a shame WotC seems reluctant to do the same for each of the colors.

[caption id="attachment_3750" align="alignright" width="273" caption="Faerie decks are blue, eh?"][/caption]

I know most of you just don't feel sorry for poor, helpless Blue.  You've been deceived, traumatized and exploited one too many times by that selfish color.  And aren't people still playing faeries  in Top 8's all over the planet?  I understand where you're coming from.  Blue is on top of the tournament scene any time it gets the chance.  There is a delicate dance that wizards has with Blue.  Giving the color its due without letting it get out of control (pun intentional).  But is the fact that blue has been good in the past  reason to kill the color all together?  What happens when Fae, Mulldrifter et al. rotate out in 60 days?  And should we really consider the Thoughtseize/Bitterblossom net-decks as part of the supposed "Blue" dominance?  Particularly in a post Volcanic Fallout / Great Sable Stag era?

Each color is entitled to be "the best" at multiple things.  Red with damage, White or Green with healing and so on.  Blue was once the master of all things control.  From drawing cards to counterspells to the good old fashioned bounce, Blue was the master of it's domain (and no that wasn't a Seinfeld reference).  But with recent sets and most obviously with M10, Blue is no longer the the master of any domain.  It's territories have been divided and sold off to the highest bidder (mostly White).

Wizard's has decided that "control" is no longer a Blue staple.  In fact, Blue won't even finish 2nd in the control race.  While we've seen cards like Shunt and Avoid Fate for some time now, Blue had always been the control champ.  It was the exception rather then the rule to see another color bust out something like Orims Chant .  But today, not only are we inundated with cards that completely destroy the counter such as Great Sable Stag, Volcanic Fallout and Vexing Shusher, we're also seeing counters in other colors.

[caption id="attachment_3746" align="alignleft" width="234" caption="Can't we make a compromise Wizards?"][/caption]

With the nixing of Cryptic Command, there is no longer a viable Blue counter in Magic the Gathering, Standard.  It is clear now since Cancel has been reprinted several times in the last 5 years that the 2 drop counter is not in Blue's future.  This is a decision I can learn live with.  But what about  a viable option that doesn't require me to play a particular creature type to be effective such as Remand or even Cryptic Command?  While most think of control as simply  saying "no" to fun, true Blue wizards understand that the color in it's mono colored, pure form is much more than that.  Its about getting card advantage, drawing out the game and bouncing permanents until you find yourself with the upper hand. None of this is possible in Magic 2010, for Blue.  Instead, Blue is graced with several nearly unplayable flying creatures (which are great in sealed btw!) and a few overpriced sorceries and enchantments.  While Time Warp is much appreciated, I would have certainly traded it from White for Silence (a card that could have easily been blue with a quick name change) in a heartbeat.  Every time I see a Blue outline peeking out of the rare slot in a pack of Magic 2010, I cringe.  Is it going to be Hive Mind or Mind Spring?  Or perhaps it'll be a Polymorph?!  It's a sad state of affairs when Jace Beleren, though certainly a great card, is far and away the most intriguing blue card in the set.

My point is this.  At all times each of the colors should be able to form a decent mono-colored, classic deck.  A balanced, hasty burn deck for Red.  A monster Green creature pump deck or a fiendish discard creature destruction Black deck.  These should always be possible in standard and extended play.  Color identity encourages player identity which is a big part of our personal connection to the game.  But those of us who identify with Blue magic now find ourselves without even a Boomerang to our name.  Unsummon cuts the mustard about as well as Remove Soul does as a Counterspell replacement.

[caption id="attachment_3733" align="alignright" width="294" caption="Blue missed the M10 train to "Color-pie Station.""][/caption]

It is a dark time for blue wizards everywhere.  Perhaps you don't care.  Perhaps you haven't played mono-colored anything since 8th Edition.  Perhaps the words "casual player" make you want to vomit.  But consider this- what are you going to be playing when the Lorywn block lands rotate out?  There is no guarantee that Zendikar will offer any help to the dual and tri-colored decks out there.  Reflecting Pool may not always be there for you, my friends.  You don't have to be a blue wizard to appreciate the need to equality and (I'll say it again) balance within the color power structure.  With the latest core set, the Magic train is steaming hard and fast towards color-pie station, its just a shame that Blue isn't aboard for the ride.

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -

So what do you think?  Are you concerned about color balance post-M10?  Do you feel sorry for Blue?  And what will Zendikar bring to the table for Blue and Modern Control decks?  Feel free to opine with your thoughts.

[poll id="10"]